Modelling requirements for HTA in Europe’s big 5 economies

Feb 1, 2023

Written by Oliver Burn, Consultant Health Economist, and Margaret Petrou, Consultant Health Economist

Adapting a global economic model for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) submissions in several countries can be challenging, as requirements can vary considerably between countries. It is important to keep differing country requirements in mind when designing a global model, to ensure it is both easily adaptable to different countries, and to avoid pitfalls, such as missing a key component required for a successful HTA submission.

We have compared the HTA requirements and methodologies across Europe’s big 5 economies (UK [England and Wales, and Scotland]), France, Germany, Italy and Spain) (1-6). Criteria are predominantly focused on methods that would require structural adaptations within a model:

      • Perspective
      • Sensitivity analysis requirements
      • Utilities (inclusion of carer utility)
      • Threshold
      • Severity modifiers

Our findings are summarised in Table 1 and detailed below.

Each country requires a different model perspective, therefore models should be easily adaptable to include different types of costs, such as societal costs. One-way, probabilistic, and scenario analyses are generally required for all countries, however models need to also be adaptable to use additional outcomes, such as net health benefit and to include functionality for probabilistic scenario analysis. EQ-5D is the most commonly preferred utility measure, and although carer quality of life (QoL) is not discussed by all countries, it is generally accepted if there is strong justification. Many countries do not have formal willingness to pay thresholds or severity modifiers; however, to accommodate those that do, the calculations for severity modifiers and flexibility for the inclusion of thresholds should be incorporated.

In summary, it is important to bear in mind what will be required early on in global model development to allow flexibility for all countries in which reimbursement will be pursued. This will help to avoid unnecessarily long adaptation times during submission. More information on the steps for a successful global model can be found here.

Table 1: HTA guidance summary

Abbreviations: CE, cost-effectiveness; CEAC, cost-effectiveness acceptability curve; CEESP, Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy; DHSC, Department of Health and Social Care; DSA, deterministic sensitivity analysis; HST, highly specialised technology; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; ISPOR, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes; NHB, net health benefit; NHS, National Health Service; OWSA, one-way sensitivity analysis; PACE, Patient and Clinician Engagement; PSA, probabilistic sensitivity analysis; PSS, Personal Social Services, QALY, quality adjusted life year; QoL, quality of life; SHI, statutory health insurance; SMC, Scottish Medicines Consortium; SMDM; Society for Medical Decision Making; WTP, willingness to pay

References 

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE health technology evaluations: the manual. 2022.
  2. Scottish Medicines Consortium. Guidance to submitting companies for completion of New Product Assessment Form (NPAF). Available at: https://wwwscottishmedicinesorguk/making-a-submission/. 2022.
  3. Haute Autorite de Sante. Choices in methods for economic evaluation – HAS. Available at https://wwwhas-santefr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-11/methodological_guidance_2020_-choices_in_methods_for_economic_evaluationpdf 2020.
  4. Agenzia Itaiana del farmaco. PER LA COMPILAZIONE DEL DOSSIER A SUPPORTO DELLA DOMANDA DI RIMBORSABILITÀ E PREZZO DI UN MEDICINALE. Available at https://wwwaifagovit/documents/20142/1307543/20210122_estratto_linee_guida_sezione_Epdf. 2019.
  5. IQWIG. General Methods. Available at https://wwwiqwigde/methoden/general-methods_version-6-1pdf 2022.
  6. López-Bastida J, Oliva J, Antonanzas F, García-Altés A, Gisbert R, Mar J, et al. Spanish recommendations on economic evaluation of health technologies. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2010;11(5):513-20.

If you would like to learn more about global economic models or discuss a current challenge, please contact us at Source Health Economics, an HEOR consultancy specialising in evidence generation, health economics, health technology assessment, and value communication.

More Insights

NICE refines the HST routing criteria: What you need to know

NICE refines the HST routing criteria: What you need to know

Written by Brian O'Toole   The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Highly Specialised Technologies (HST) programme is designed to evaluate innovative treatments for rare and complex conditions. On 19th March ... Read more

Systematic review case study: scoping research to identify comparators

Systematic review case study: scoping research to identify comparators

Written by Sneha Bhadti and David Pritchett   Establishing a list of relevant comparators at the protocol development stage is a vital step in the systematic literature review (SLR) process. Scoping research during this stage can help ... Read more

National Numeracy Day 2025: Why money and maths matter in health economics

National Numeracy Day 2025: Why money and maths matter in health economics

Written by Abby Paine and Dom Partridge This is our third year celebrating National Numeracy Day, and this year’s theme of money is especially relevant for those of us working in health economics and market access. In previous years, ... Read more

Maximising SLRs for HEOR – why PICO matters

Maximising SLRs for HEOR – why PICO matters

Written by Susan O’Connell and Sara Bartlome   Introduction Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) seek to answer a specific research question by translating the question into search terms and developing a literature search strategy to ... Read more